UPDATE 29/3/23: Shortly after publishing this post, the fundamentalist at Theology Archaeology issued an apology for his remarks. Whilst I do not agree that my statements were unclear, I accept his apology, and removed his name from this post.
I swore to myself I would not respond to the ignorance and deceit of certain, rabid fundamentalists, yet wrapped up within all his dishonest rhetoric was one particular line that left me angry.
Yet he has no qualms about murdering or seeing murdered innocent Christians. He has totally lost it.
Do you see that? The fundie has outright said I would have no problem murdering Christians. He thinks I do not have a problem with seeing Christians murdered.
This is a cowardly and libellous allegation, without basis or merit. It is unlikely that the cowardly fundamentalist will even consider retracting it, but he should, for this is beyond outrageous. I have saved a copy of his post, to preserve his lies, and I am now considering what legal paths I have to hold him to account for his dishonesty (alas, there isn’t much I can do, but it might be worth a look). This is more than mere goading from him, this is a claim that I would actually murder Christians! In case he has forgotten, it was one of his fundamentalist cohorts who openly declared he would kill me if he thought God had told him to!
There’s lots more to unpack from all this. Suffice to say, the staggering dishonesty on display is something I will look into dealing with, via whatever legal means are at my disposal. I’m unlikely to have much joy in that, but despite David’s unreasonable bluster, I would never turn to violence, and never incite others to violence, in order to resolve problems. I can understand the possible motives for what happened in Nashville (I offered only my opinions as to why this terrible tragedy unfolded), but I never wielded that as a justification for it, as David knows, yet he deceives and distorts with his words. I would like to think he might have some integrity, and that he may apologise for his reprehensible remark.
2
0
20
You are a joke
A typical response from you. How childish you are. You are fortunate that legal proceedings against your awful smearing of me would be pointless, due to your location and use of multiple aliases. I take it you are not going to retract your dishonest remarks?
Is this Dr Tee bloke a genuine MD?
There is one listed when the name is Googled.
I have no idea. He won’t speak of his credentials in any great detail.
Perhaps ‘he’ is just another sock puppet?
You do seem to attract them!
I don’t think he’s a sockpuppet. In fact, from what I’ve learned, he definitely isn’t one. He operates with a couple of different emails, runs two websites (that I know of), and there is a bunch of other stuff I can’t get into.
Ah, I see you did issue an apology. This is surprising, but I accept it. I do not agree that my words were misleading however.
Out of interest does this person allow commrnts on their blog?
I noted that the writer uses the term “We…” rather than I or me.
Are there several writers or is this simply an avoidance tactic?
Currently, they do not allow comments. It’s one person writing everything.
Hardly worth the both of reading then.
I would simply refuse to allow any sort of access to my blog if someone behaved in this manner.
When Colorstorm started to moderate my comments on his blog I reciprocated. He soon got the message.
I have tried to move away from reading his posts, and I have certainly tried not to respond, but his comments about murder were beyond all reason. However, he has apologised, which means I consider the matter closed. Generally, all his comments go to moderation, and these days, they go no further, aside from whatever I feel like letting through.
It’s hard to ignore Thiessen when he writes a post about you virtually every day. He’s obsessed with Ben Berwick and Bruce Gerencser. I offered to send him my famous naked Santa on a dance pole picture free of charge, but be declined. His loss. 🙂
He removed his apology, by the way.
Yeah, the apology thing got weird. He reposted, saying he removed it, but didn’t recant it. Then he went off on one of his usual rants.
I banned Thiessen on my blog. However, he has my email address, so I get occasional emails from him. Nothing I can do about it. Typically, I respond with pictures of scantily clad men. 🙂
He removed his contact form too. Thiessen is Elijah, the only one who hasn’t bowed a knee to Baal, the one true defender of monogamous, heterosexual, married, missionary position sex. 🙂