Skip to content
Menu
Meerkat Musings
  • Welcome to Meerkat Musings
  • Meerkat Podcasts
  • Why Meerkats?
  • Formula 1
  • Why I love…
  • What I think…
  • Sci-Fi Analysis
  • Reviews
  • Meerkat Fiction
  • Meerkat Book Reviews
  • Sites Meerkats Like
  • If Meerkats Could…
  • The Meerkat Muse
  • Site Updates
Meerkat Musings

The Creationists vs the Meerkat (again)

Posted on August 10, 2016
Tweet
Follow me

wpid-wp-1446741446606.jpg

 

I don’t even know why. I sort of despair at both the material I’m reading, and myself. I’m not merely hurling myself at a brick wall. I’m loading myself into a cannon, and blasting myself toward it, even though I know full well it won’t do any good. Yet still I launch myself.

Why? Maybe it’s because I’m a stubborn, argumentative meerkat. Or I’m just a sucker for punishment. Either way, not for the first time, let’s dismantle a creationist argument.

I’ve never heard of PJ Media. All I know is someone has submitted an article to their site and that article is the one I’m discussing. Strap in folks.

I take comfort in knowing that in one thousand years, people will be laughing at today’s science. Oh, they’ll be polite and suppress the belly laugh that wants to come out whenever early 21st century science is mentioned. Things like, “they did their best with what was available to them” and “don’t be too hard on them; it’s not their fault that their perspective was so limited and their methodology so laughably inadequate” will be tossed around at future cocktail parties as a way of showing sympathy for ignorant ancestors. But make no mistake, in one thousand years, much of the science that current schoolchildren are taught will have been relegated to the historical dust heap of mostly wrong and definitely poorly interpreted. Someone should tell all of that to the current worshipers of science.

The level of hubris that’s innate in the religion of scientism is why I admittedly find self-serving comfort in current science’s future comeuppance. To be fair, not all scientists giddily sacrifice any perspective on the altar of scientific absolutism. In fact, I can’t think of any scientists that I personally know who aren’t humbled by the limitations within their field and their own fallibility. It’s the followers of science and the pop-scientists who get all worked up in the defense of their religion, especially social “scientists.”

You know, it’s entirely possible that some of today’s science will look pretty bad compared to what we’ve learned in a thousand years’ time. On the other hand, following a method that is methodical and consistent and not rooted in the docterine of any singular religious text is more likely to yield things that we can build upon. Our current understanding of science (and its evolution) has given us planes, trains, cars, advanced irrigation methods, means of building more stable housing, the internet, the ability to perform organ transplants, and so much more. All of these developments are the result of a steady progression, sometimes marked by a ‘eureka’ moment, but never to the dramatic extent that some people think.

None of these developments and the science behind them will be binned, it will be built upon, so we can develop better versions of existing technology and new technologies and processes that will be of greater benefit to us. It’s therefore more likely that kids in a thousand years will still be learning of the same basic principles, and applying them to whatever has come up in that time frame.

Now, to refer to science as a ‘religion’ is an intriguing notion. It is commonly put forward by those who don’t actually understand what science is or what it’s objective is. I’m sure there are some who might view science as a religion of sorts – but make no mistake, this article is already starting to conflate science with atheism, which is misleading.

Last week, NPR treated us to a condescending and science-worshipping article written by Barbara King, an anthropology professor whose latest book is titled How Animals Grieve. If King had stopped at the usual scientism slurping, that would have been bad enough. King, however, took the extra step and demanded an obeisance from parents and the complete sacrifice of their children to the god of contemporary science.

Taking aim at young earth creationism as manifest by Ken Ham and Answers in Genesis, Barbara King scolds reporters who give any positive attention to, in King’s words, “anti-science creationist discourse.” She goes on to explain how society has failed our children by allowing them to be exposed to anything but evolution. After a series of proposed remedies, King concludes her condescending rant by declaring that, “Our children must be taught about evolutionary science in order to be science-literate [emphasis added].”

I would invite readers to look at Barbara King’s article for themselves. She is not wrong in questioning the positive spin on what is harmful pseudo-science. Creationism undermines efforts to actually learn about the world around us, and ironically creationists do indeed worship something – that the Bible is literally true, and cannot be questioned, and therefore any evidence needs to be squeezed to fit the premise.

The thing is, almost every single person that I know who believes that God created everything (however the specifics are defined) believes that children should also be taught about evolution in order to be science-literate. The difference between many creationists and many evolutionists is that creationists do not worship science. And that difference means that many creationists are not threatened by competing views, and they recognize that science is limited and prone to being proven wrong. They believe that being science-literate includes also being taught competing ideas and theories as well as learning the blind spots and weaknesses of the currently favored scientific paradigms.

Emphasis mine. Once again the author conflates science with belief. ‘Evolutionists’ (in itself a misleading term, since it implies faith-driven ideas rather than evidence-driven conclusions) can also believe in God but not in the ultra-strict interpretation of religious texts that creationists believe. Unravel any element of creationism and its followers will simply ignore it.

Barbara King and her ilk, however, are not actually concerned with guarding the scientific purity of our children. Their real objective is to require that their worldview be privileged over competing worldviews.

The irony here is that creationists want to undermine science with pseudo-science and thus ensure the supremcy of their specific religious beliefs. Barbara King and her colleagues are fighting against this idea.

Since scientism is a faith-based religion, and a faith-based religion that has the entire trajectory of science history undermining it, scientism’s adherents have to forcefully clear the worldview deck in order for their religion to flourish. In the marketplace of ideas, the weaker ideas are going to need some handicapping, so to speak.

The thing is, next to no one is attempting to keep children from learning about evolution. Creationists that have any sway over policy want children to learn options. There is a concerted effort, however, to frame worldview discussions in a manner that eliminates any worldview that doesn’t bow down to the current, most-privileged group-think. In other words, Barbara King isn’t really concerned that your children be science-literate; she wants to make sure that your children aren’t exposed to ideas that threaten her larger worldview. She wants control.

Once again there is a great deal of irony here (not to mention I have read more than one creationist statement that would wish the teaching of evolution condemned as ‘evil’). Creationists would love to force evolution out of the equation in favour of their ideas. The problem is, there is a great deal of evidence gathered carefully and over the span of many fields that contradicts them. When faced with this, they seek to undermine science instead.

Controlling the education of children is one of the front lines in the battle of worldviews. Barbara King realizes that for her religion of scientism to flourish, children’s education has to be devoid of competing ideas.

You don’t need to believe that the earth is only six thousand years old and that dinosaurs walked the earth at the same time as humans in order to see the danger in surrendering the control over education to Barbara King. Regardless of what you think about Ken Ham and Answers in Genesis, it’s important to guard the freedom of ideas for all. And it’s important for our children to be exposed to a variety of worldviews, because that’s true education.

I would actually agree that freedom of ideas is important, to a point. There is however, such as a thing as taking this notion too far. Allowing creationist pseudo-science into actual scientific education will only undermine education.

Please follow and like us:
error0
fb-share-icon0
Tweet
fb-share-icon20

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

The Awakening UK

The Awakening USA

Please like and follow this meerkat!

Facebook
Facebook
fb-share-icon
Twitter
Visit Us
Follow Me
Tweet
YouTube
Follow by Email

Meerkat Comments

  • Football Manager P17 – Tough Lessons – Meerkat Musings on Football Manager P18 – Middle of the Road
  • Football Manager P18 – Middle of the Road – Meerkat Musings on Football Manager P17 – Tough Lessons
  • Football Manager P16 – Mighty Eagles – Meerkat Musings on Football Manager P17 – Tough Lessons
  • Football Manager P17 – Tough Lessons – Meerkat Musings on Football Manager P16 – Mighty Eagles
  • Football Manager P15 – Soaring Eagles – Meerkat Musings on Football Manager P16 – Mighty Eagles

Meerkat Tweets

Ben BerwickFollow

Ben Berwick
Retweet on TwitterBen Berwick Retweeted
SelfPubShowcaseSelfPubShowcase@SelfPubShowcase·
7h

A fallen warrior, together with a small band, must tear down everything his kind holds dear and reshape his people -- or see them utterly destroyed. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08DK71165 #scifi #action #adventure @darth_timon

Reply on Twitter 1366490938688864258Retweet on Twitter 13664909386888642581Like on Twitter 13664909386888642581Twitter 1366490938688864258
darth_timonBen Berwick@darth_timon·
16h

😱

Anthony Rapp Voted for Biden Black Lives Matter@albinokid

Type your name in the GIFs. The third one is you when you’re drunk. https://twitter.com/druiddude/status/1366213503288152065

Reply on Twitter 1366355875212918785Retweet on Twitter 1366355875212918785Like on Twitter 13663558752129187851Twitter 1366355875212918785
Retweet on TwitterBen Berwick Retweeted
SelfPubShow3Self-Publishers' Showcase@SelfPubShow3·
28 Feb

A fallen warrior, together with a small band, must tear down everything his kind holds dear and reshape his people -- or see them utterly destroyed. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08DK71165 #scifi #action #adventure @darth_timon

Reply on Twitter 1366128550592581632Retweet on Twitter 13661285505925816321Like on Twitter 13661285505925816321Twitter 1366128550592581632
darth_timonBen Berwick@darth_timon·
28 Feb

It appears @JackShep72 has blocked me over his inability to answer easy questions.

Reply on Twitter 1366103956418682886Retweet on Twitter 1366103956418682886Like on Twitter 1366103956418682886Twitter 1366103956418682886
darth_timonBen Berwick@darth_timon·
28 Feb

https://twitter.com/JackShep72/status/1366050355470094337?s=19 Imagine being Jack, afraid of simple questions.

Reply on Twitter 1366054085561090048Retweet on Twitter 1366054085561090048Like on Twitter 1366054085561090048Twitter 1366054085561090048
Load More...

Meerkat Categories

  • Art
  • Books
  • Charity
  • Family
  • Fiction
  • Film
  • Food
  • Football
  • Formula 1
  • Funny
  • Games
  • History
  • Interwebs
  • Music
  • Other Stuff
  • Politics
  • Religion
  • Reviews
  • Sci Fi
  • Science
  • Site News
  • Society
  • Technology
  • TV
  • Uncategorized
  • Weird
  • Work

Meerkat Podcasts

Meerkat Musings
Meerkat Musings
A man (meerkat?) called Ben discusses the world!

Podcast Subscription Menu

  • Visit Website
  • RSS Feed
FM21 – Going Up
by Ben Berwick

The Eagles Soar!

FM21 – Going Up
FM21 – Going Up
February 25, 2021
Ben Berwick
Zelda 35
February 21, 2021
Ben Berwick
Football Manager 2021 Career
February 21, 2021
Ben Berwick
The latest Aldershot Action!
February 14, 2021
Ben Berwick
Rambles
January 30, 2021
Ben Berwick
Football Manager 2021 – Upwards
January 29, 2021
Ben Berwick
Absolute Power
January 23, 2021
Ben Berwick
Football Manager 2021 – The New Career P1
January 23, 2021
Ben Berwick
Favourite Day of the Week
January 17, 2021
Ben Berwick
Meerkat Musings on 2021!
January 8, 2021
Ben Berwick
Search Results placeholder
©2021 Meerkat Musings | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes.com